<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>SelfHelpMe.Net &#187; 1028</title>
	<atom:link href="http://selfhelpme.net/category/1028/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://selfhelpme.net</link>
	<description>Health References</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 06:47:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Terra med Alliance News US anger at new age rules for ****** cancer tests</title>
		<link>http://selfhelpme.net/terra-med-alliance-news-us-anger-at-new-age-rules-for-cancer-tests</link>
		<comments>http://selfhelpme.net/terra-med-alliance-news-us-anger-at-new-age-rules-for-cancer-tests#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 15:50:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1028]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cancer In Women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lives Each Year]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mammograms]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://selfhelpme.net/terra-med-alliance-news-us-anger-at-new-age-rules-for-cancer-tests</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Terramed Alliance ****** Cancer Org. asked:  Terra med Alliance News Doctors and experts are in uproar over new recommendations to raise the age of ****** cancer screening, warning more women will die from the disease which already claims some 40,000 lives each year.Terra med Alliance News : Doctors and experts are in uproar over new [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="float:left; padding: 12px"><a href="/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/cancer1.jpg"><img src="/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/cancer1.jpg" title='' alt='' /></a></div>
<div><em><strong>Terramed Alliance ****** Cancer Org.</strong> asked: </em><br/><br/><br/> <br/><br/>Terra med Alliance News Doctors and experts are in uproar over new recommendations to raise the age of ****** cancer screening, warning more women will die from the disease which already claims some 40,000 lives each year.<br/><br/>Terra med Alliance News : Doctors and experts are in uproar over new recommendations to raise the age of ****** cancer screening, warning more women will die from the disease which already claims some 40,000 lives each year.<br/><br/>The high-level United States Preventative Services Task Force of scientists and researchers Monday recommended that ****** cancer screening in women should now start at the age of 50 as opposed to 40.<br/><br/>And it further said that women between the ages of 50 to 74 should be screened every two years instead of annually.<br/><br/>&#8220;Screening saves lives, and cutting back on screening would cost lives,&#8221; said Dr. Timothy Johnson, an oncologist at Holyoke Medical Center in Massachusetts.<br/><br/>&#8220;I&#8217;m against the proposals to cut back the screening on women between the age of 40 and 50, absolutely,&#8221; he told AFP.<br/><br/>Some 210,000 American women are affected by the disease each year, and ****** tumors are the most common cancer in women patients at Holyoke.<br/><br/>The task force&#8217;s findings came two years after the panel issued a report which looked at the same issue, but did not recommend raising the screening age.<br/><br/>Some wondered whether the recommendations issued Monday were part of a cost-cutting effort as the United States wrestles to reform its health care system, something it wasn&#8217;t doing two years ago.<br/><br/><strong>Terra med Alliance</strong> News: But if that was the idea, cutting mammograms for younger women was not the way to go, said Dr Christine Pellegrino of the Montefiore-Einstein Center for Cancer Care in New York.<br/><br/>&#8220;Are they going to not reimburse mammograms for younger women versus potentially having to absorb the case of a woman who presents years later with advanced ****** cancer where you&#8217;re talking chemotherapy, surgery, more chemo, radiation and a great potential for recurrence?&#8221; Pellegrino, who is director of Montefiore-Einstein&#8217;s ****** clinic, wondered.<br/><br/>&#8220;Not only does that have a huge financial cost but also a devastating psychological impact,&#8221; said Pellegrino, who was also opposed to hiking the starting age for ****** cancer screening.<br/><br/>&#8220;If a woman shows up at 50 for her first screening and they find out she has this big cancer, and you know that if you had screened her a few years earlier you would have found it&#8230; whether you&#8217;re the patient or the provider, if you have to say, &#8216;Well, if we had done this two years earlier,&#8217; nobody will recover from that.&#8221;<br/><br/>Mammograms currently cost the US public health system, Medicare, between three and five billion dollars a year.<br/><br/>One reason the task force gave for phasing out mammograms for younger women was the higher incidence of false-positive results in the group. These caused significant stress and led to unnecessary biopsies and treatment.<br/><br/>But cancer survivor Debbie Guardian said a false-positive was a small price to pay for catching the real thing in time.<br/><br/>&#8220;What&#8217;s worse? A lot of stress only to find out it was plain old calcification or a lot of stress to discover you&#8217;ve got ****** cancer but it&#8217;s treatable because you were screened on time?&#8221; Guardian, whose doctors confirmed she had ****** cancer days after her 50th birthday last year, told AFP.<br/><br/>&#8220;I went every single year (for a mammogram) starting at 40. Had I not gone when I was still 49, I wouldn&#8217;t have known I had cancer because it wasn&#8217;t big enough for me to feel, but it was big enough to be serious,&#8221; she said.<br/><br/>&#8220;What this esteemed panel of experts is recommending is not wise, to put it politely. Based on personal experience, I wholeheartedly disagree with them,&#8221; she said.<br/><br/>Pellegrino said the panel&#8217;s recommendations went against years of efforts to raise awareness of ****** cancer.<br/><br/>&#8220;To start telling women, &#8216;I know you just turned 40 but we&#8217;re not going to do your baseline mammogram&#8217; &#8212; the reaction is going to be one of complete visceral disbelief like, &#8216;What do you mean I&#8217;m not going to have my mammogram&#8217;?&#8221;<br/><br/>According to this year&#8217;s report, one life is saved for every 1,900 women aged 40-49 screened for ****** cancer, compared to one life for every 1,300 in the 50-59 year age group.<br/><br/>&#8220;You may have to screen 1,900 women a year to save one life, but that&#8217;s part of cancer screening,&#8221; said Johnson. &#8220;We see a lot of women in their 40s with ****** cancer, and by screening younger women, we save lives.&#8221;<br/><br/><strong>Terra med Alliance </strong>is a non-profit charity organization dedicated to research, education and advocacy of ****** cancer. One of the vision of Terramed Alliance is to provide this community and Internet users with a charity based research and education entity. Advocacy of ****** cancer through education is vital to the reduction of this disease.  For any requests and enquiries, please contact at us: cancer@terramedalliance.us www.terramedalliance.us<br/><br/><br/></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://selfhelpme.net/terra-med-alliance-news-us-anger-at-new-age-rules-for-cancer-tests/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

